The Group President, W. Keith Plant, and his wife Mavis were amongst those welcoming visitors from widespread parts of the world to the Plant Millennium Reunion at the Village Hall near Chelford in Cheshire, UK.
The day included a coach tour of the surrounding countryside, which appears to have been the principal homeland of the Plants from c1380-1680. There was also a presentation on the medieval Origins of the Plant Name by Dr John S. Plant of nearby Keele University. This is outlined by the Slides of this Presentation which has led on to further developments in such articles as John S Plant (1999-onwards), Roots and Branches, Issue Number 18 onwards [see update below].
Update on slides of the talk
It should be added that evidence for the Plantagenet name, when the Plant surname was forming, is sparse. The term 'Plantagenet child' was used in the talk [and included in the slides] to indicate a child in the context of the Angevin ('Plantagenet') nobility. There is some evidence of proximities of early Plant records to the noble descendants of Geffrey Plante Genest of Anjou. These descendants included the 'Plantagenet' kings of England; but, the nineteenth-century claim that the Plants were royal Plantagenet decendants is debunked elsewhere on this web-site. The talk concluded by suggesting a possible hypothesis whereby the Plants could have been assorted auxiliaries, particularly in the context of 'Plantagenet' campaigns against the Welsh.
However, perhaps the biggest development since the talk is that subsequent DNA evidence has indicated that the Plants were likely many polygynous children forming mostly a large single family. This places more emphasis on the Welsh Marches meaning 'children' than a more general 'establisher' sense of to plant. The more general 'establisher' sense, listed in the Oxford English Dictionary, was highlighted in the talk as it might have been appropriate to the 'colonising' of Wales by 'auxiliaries'. More directly however, planta means 'to procreate' in Welsh.
The DNA evidence brings to the fore ideas of male line relatedness and a large number of early bastards; and, a suggested meaning '[many] children' of Plant can now be seen as an implicit patronymic of some unspecified forefather. It then becomes natural to wonder who that forefather might have been. However, it is important to stress that there is no direct evidence of a blood relationship of the large Plant family to anyone in the 'Plantagenet' royal family. The Plants are found mainly near the Welsh Marches and no genetic connection has been established to a distant, earlier landholder called de la Planta in the 'Plantagenet' homeland of Anjou, let alone to the forefather there of the 'Plantagenet' kings, Geffrey Plante Genest, himself. That is not to say that it has been ruled out that the early Plant fathers may have been part of a cultural affinity to that Angevin regime.
Plant Family History Group Homepage